Related Articles

8 Comments

  1. 1

    Anne Ferber

    Once again another example of short-sighted, budget focussed ELECTED politicians in a LABOR government that don’t ‘give a toss’ about the long term health ramifications their decisions have upon the people of our state. Obesity, Diabetes, Arthritis, and some Cancers – PREVENTABLE illnesses costing our state billions $$$. WAKE-UP Weatherill and Snelling, do your homework! So you think the health budget has blown out… let’s wait and see what it looks like in 2018 without health prevention intervention!!!! The best is yet to come! Can the state coffers afford not to try and prevent these illnesses in the future?

    Reply
  2. 2

    Sue O'Brien

    It is disappointing that politicians are not looking at the bigger picture and realising that prevention is better than cure, Community Foodies and community health workers are making a difference to families their loss will significantly impact children and families health and well being.

    Reply
  3. 3

    Wayne Roesler

    Spot on Kaye! With Community Foodies progam now being put up for tender to a NGO, there is a very real fear that the expert support, resources, professionl development and the credibility of the program with be lost and this is exactly what has made the Community Foodies program the success that it is. There needs to be a committment by SA Health in the tendering process to include the Community Foodies program managers, they have intimate knowledge of the program and the expertise gained over the programs life of 10 years – this has to be seen as a valuable tool by SA Health and to not utlise this would be disrespecting South Australian communities that have and are reaping the benefits now of the successful Community Foodies program.
    South Australians should be very concerned about what implications will be seen in the future without the Government now investing in preventative and early intervention helath programs and strategies…..no crystal ball needed to know that the health budget will take a hammering when preventable illnesses and chronic disease rates rise! Angela Roesler, Murraylands Community Foodie

    Reply
  4. 4

    Margaret Ferris

    In Response to the article:
    ‘Cuts to community-based health services short-sighted’
    I absolutely agree. The diverting of resources from wide reaching, community-involved Health Promotion focused programs – to Treatment of the often preventable illnesses resulting from unhealthy health-related lifestyle habits is analogous to ‘shifting deckchairs on the Titanic’..or perhaps:- giving everyone a deckchair instead of stocking the lifeboats and seeing that as many people as possible know how to lower them safely into the ocean (and maybe even have more chance of keeping a clear head over panic). And, the unfortunate culture of upping middle management levels whilst cutting out or hobbling the experts on the ground which has dominated over the past 10-20 yrs (marketisation, placing financial profit as the ruling imperative of every aspect of life) has dismantled the real efficacy, certainly integrity of more and more of our public (and private) institutions. Here we go again.. unless politicians and beurocrats can get a wider, longer view. I’m aware that our hospitals and general practise medical clinics are also in need of more funding (who isn’t?) and, call me ‘Optimistic'(!) but I’m surprised to find that the concept of ‘Preventative Medicine'(from the 60s-70s)seems to be taken less, rather than more seriously than it was 40 years ago.
    I hope The South Australian government’s announcement on Friday 21 March to cut $14.7 million of community-based health services (euphemistically called non-hospital health services) is reconsidered and reversed.

    Margaret Ferris

    Reply
  5. 5

    Fran Baum

    Thanks Kaye for noting the impact of the implementation of the SA McCann Review. What is so sad is that South Australia has been a world leader in terms of its community health services and community health movement. These services and movement built on the foresighted Community Health Program funded under the Whitlam Government. The CHP established ground breaking community health services like the Noarlunga Health Village which led to the internationally recognized Noarlunga Healthy Cities initiative and Onkaparaginga community injury prevention program and the women’s health centers in Adelaide which were trail blazers in the provision of health care to women which was respectful and effective. These centers were governed by community boards of management which linked them to the health concerns of the community and saw good use of scare resources. When I spoke internationally about these services people were always impressed. Internationally visitors (including the then WHO’s Ilona Kickbusch and Canada’s Health Promotion guru Prof Ron Labonte) always expressed deep admiration at the work of our community health centers. (see more about the work of these community health centers in my book The New Public Health).
    In the past 5 years The South Australian Labor Government has systematically undermined this program through a continual series of cuts. Only an entirely short-sighted view of health can make any sense of this. It is highly likely that we will see adverse consequences on the health of South Australians and especially that of those with the worse health status. We will also see adverse consequences on our health budget because the preventive work ( especially the good community development work) these centers did has not been replaced and means people will suffer more il health. Their community development and health promotion work cannot be can not be easily replaced because it depends on skills and community trust andpartnerships that had developed over many years. Painstakingly careful work went into working along communities ( as opposed to ineffectively telling people how to be healthy) and developing their skills to make themselves healthier – the community foodies described by Kaye is but one example. Just one more was an occupational injury program with small business to reduce eye injury ( and it did this a removed the demand for emergency dept for eye injury just one example of the cost saving). All this valuable community capital squandered by a short-sighted government.

    What South Australia now needs a robust “Restore our community health services” campaign to make our State government come to its senses and see beyond a very narrowly defined dollar sign as a driver of its health policy.

    Reply
  6. 6

    Anaf Julia

    The importance of the trust and commitment of partnerships across health and other sectors at the community level that have been built up over many years should not be underestimated. These have contributed to better outcomes for health and well-being by building a bigger picture for how best to respond, coordinating different players with complementary skills and knowledge, bringing in shared resources that can be strategically funnelled in a cost effective way, and building mutual capacity across the sectors.

    The implications of dismantling these partnerships are enormous – both the financial loss of their cost effective operations in support of health, and the loss of shared knowledge and expertise… a truly blinkered view of how to achieve short-term ‘savings’.

    Reply
  7. 7

    Ursula Rose

    Reflecting on Kaye’s article has me thinking of what government can and cannot do. It is a key driver and reinforcer (both) of the tone and attitudes of a society. There are many examples of the important role government has played in creating social change – in big and small ways. Anti-smoking legislation, the introduction of social welfare over the decades, universal health care schemes for example. Social policy implementation by the public sector has been an important part of this.
    Community Foodies is an example of the way that government has supported creative partnerships within communities to improve health. By supporting the program in the public sector, it says that this is something that we should all be concerned about and can support. It says that the whole society has a role to play in supporting each other to stay healthy. Moving the program to the non-government sector says something different altogether. It says that it is really only a program for the ‘needy’, who can be supported through a charity model. It does not reinforce the broad role all of us play in creating the society that we live in.
    The values that underpin the McCann review do not reinforce ideas of fairness, prevention, and mutual responsibility for assisting each other to stay well. The McCann review, and the cuts it heralds, are great news for junk food purveyors, and those who see the individual as the only entity that needs to take responsibility.
    The state government does not join the ranks of inspirational leaders who have helped to move the society in more positive directions through decisions that only it can take. It joins forces with mean-spiritedness, unimaginative government, and the senseless cutting down of highly creative and effective work by its own workforce. It is deeply disillusioning and disappointing.

    Reply
  8. 8

    liz hetzel

    A well written explanation of why this preventative approach is so effective and essential to preserve. It seems irresponsible, short sighted and completely nonsensical that this funding has been so severely compromised, in fact withdrawn. Surely someone in the SA health government advisory team is listening to people who have expertise and understand preventative health…..or, it appears not.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2015 – 2020 Croakey | Website: Rock Lily Design

right-share-menu

Follow Croakey