Related Articles

4 Comments

  1. 1

    Bogdanovist

    I agree for the most part, but this article seems to leave the responsibility on the family, who can only make a good decision if they are given the full unsweetened information about an individuals condition.

    For example, my Gran spent the last 3 or so weeks of her life (in her late 80’s) in an ICU. It was only when she finally died that the doctor explained to us that she was never a chance she was going to recover. Had we known that we would have pulled her out to her local hospital, in her own town, which has an appropriate palliative care unit, where her friends and family could have come to see her (the large hospital she died in was 2-3 hours away in Sydney). She would have been more comfortable and in a calmer environment, and it would have been much much cheaper for the tax payer. She would have been very happy with this (she kept telling us how much she hated being in the hospital and just wanted to go home and be at peace).

    The only reason we did not do this was because the doctors and nurses kept giving us hope and the impression that she had a chance of recovery. For instance, after performing an emergency tracheotomy, they told us to make sure she held the bandage over the hole down when she talked, so that the wound would close up. Clearly this implies that she has a future (when in fact she died a few days later, as the doctors apparently always expected).

    Perhaps there is a fear from Doctors that families will become angry if they perceive that not everything possible is being done for Granny, and this is why they were less than frank with us about her condition. Maybe, but I think a lot (most?) people these days do understand that there is choice between dying more peacefully or living a fraction longer in a terrible way, and would prefer the former. However, without the Doctors being crystal clear about whether a person faces that choice or whether they have a temporary and curable ailment then that choice can’t be made.

    Reply
  2. 2

    Fiona

    Come to Canberra, where we’re about to sign over the hospice to the Catholic church… they know how to prolong life.

    Reply
  3. 3

    Tim Woodruff

    Agree with the general comments of Peter Arnold. What is being suggested should happen. There is a problem however, with calling the GP, district nursing service, or palliative care team, in many areas of Australia. They aren’t available when needed. Home visits by GPs are now I think about 10% of the level of 20 years ago. It may cost $100 out of pocket, or more get such a visit. The same situation arises in nursing homes, already understaffed, and patients reach crisis point which sends them to Emergency where doctors trained to save lives do so.
    tim woodruff
    doctors reform society

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2015 – 2019 Croakey | Website: Rock Lily Design

right-share-menu

Follow Croakey