Related Articles

3 Comments

  1. 1
    Melissa Sweet

    Melissa Sweet

    Glenn Salkeld (School of Public Health, University of Sydney) sent in this comment: “You are bang on the mark with this Croakey post. Our political system makes it difficult for the unorganised and unfunded to have
    a voice that penetrates. But social networks and the connectivity
    provided by the net can make a real difference in sending the message
    to those who need to listen. But a helping hand is needed. Those who are
    well educated and know how to express our desires need to help those who may not have the capability to desire or to express that desire.”

    Reply
  2. 2
    Melissa Sweet

    Melissa Sweet

    Ian McAuley (Centre for Policy Development and University of Canberra) sent in this comment:

    “My main concern is whether the Health and Hospitals Reform Commission will propose any reforms which will bring the various elements of health care together as an integrated system, or will they take the present fragmentation as a given condition? If they have a system view, how will they reconcile the different values and principles built into the present elements – values and principles which reflect economic concerns and political fashions and prejudices of the different times these programs were designed.

    And that leads to the question of whether they can bring together the best of centralised financing and the best of market forces. At present our financing of health care disingenuously combines many of the worst features of both. Among these distortions are private insurance, which has all the moral hazard of public insurance but without its capacity for cost and utilization control, protection of many providers (particularly pharmacists) from the full forces of price competition, and a mix of pricing ranging from free through to prohibitively expensive services, which distort both consumer and provider choice.”

    Reply
  3. 3

    Jenny Haines

    The Bennett Interim Report will no doubt generate debate from the vested interests in the health system but it has to be remembered that behind those vested interests are often very valid concerns about quality and safety that should not be easily ignored. It is not always just about self interest. The AMA and the ANF do represent vested interests in the health care system but there is a power imbalance between these organisations which the current Federal Government is trying to address. It is reasonable that the organisations representing thousands of professionals and workers in the health system are consulted and their voices are heard along with the representatives of organisations that foreshadow initiatives and new directions in the health system.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2015 – 2019 Croakey | Website: Rock Lily Design

right-share-menu

Follow Croakey